GGI Projects

We conduct thematic research and give policy-oriented advice for a variety of national and international bodies. At the heart of our approach lie independence and impartiality, and a deliberate mix of conceptual and policy-oriented perspectives, promoting ‘pragmatic idealism’ in global problem-solving. We participate in several international projects.

Projects
Enhancing Democracy through Parliamentary Capacity-building in EU Accession Countries
The Global Governance Institute’s Democracy and Human Rights Unit is leading a new policy and advice project for the European Parliament, focusing on how national parliaments in European Union accession countries can be strengthened to reinforce democracy across the nine countries hoping to join the EU in the future. Implemented in cooperation with Ecorys Poland, the project examines and assesses various tools and past efforts of EU member states, international organisations and NGOs in strengthening the administrative, procedural and political capacities of the national parliaments of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Türkiye and Ukraine. The main aim of the project is to advise the European Parliament’s Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) as well as the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) on how to reinforce the European Parliament’s parliamentary capacity-building policies and approaches in the context of EU Enlargement. Drawing on an extensive comparative analysis of past and current parliamentary support programmes by EU member states’ parliaments, the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the Inter-parliamentary Union (IPU), NATO’s Parliamentary Assembly as well as a wide range of international and local NGOs, the project will identify best practices and concrete examples of how to effectively strengthen and enhance the democratic functioning and impact of national parliaments in the accession countries. The project’s deliverables include an in-depth study based on more than 80 interviews with national and international experts, an extensive mapping exercise and two briefings of members of the European Parliament in Strasbourg (DEG) and Brussels (AFET). The project will serve as an important foundation for the GGI Democracy and Human Rights Unit’s wider work on democratic resilience and capacity-building across the EU and wider global context.
The Global Governance of Autonomous Weapon Systems
GGI’s Peace and Security and AI and Global Governance sections have launched a new research and policy advice project on “The Global Governance of Autonomous Weapon Systems: Policy Gaps, Regulation Challenges and Governance Opportunities”. The project, carried out in partnership with the Global Challenges Foundation (GCF) in Stockholm examines the complex challenges as well as various actors’ recent, current and future approaches related to governing and regulating Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS), including lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS). The project will focus on the multiple implications of the development and use of AWS and will provide a comprehensive overview of various existing and potential future approaches to their global governance. This includes a mapping and review of the numerous ongoing initiatives and frameworks to address the challenges AWS pose, including efforts by the United Nations (UN GGE, General Assembly, Office of the Secretary General), regional groups, alliances of states and initiatives advanced by NGO alliances. Based on this analysis, the project will identify key policy and legal gaps, the tensions between the fast-paced development of AWS and AI in the military realm on the one hand and the search for the effective governance of AWS and the mitigation of risks they pose. This also includes a discussion of the potential consequences of AWS on warfare, highlighting concerns regarding accountability, human control, and the violation of international laws such as International Humanitarian Law (IHL), International Criminal Law (ICL), and International Human Rights Law (IHRL). Finally, the project will advance concrete policy recommendations, based on the input gathered from background interviews with more than 40 core experts (including representatives from the diplomatic and military communities, international and regional organisations, NGOs, civil society and academia as well as the private sector) and on outcomes of the discussions of a high-level expert workshop in Brussels in April. It is hoped that the outcomes of this project will lead to the creation of a strong network and evidence-based proposals for approaching the issue of the global governance of AWS more concretely and more effectively.
Informing Conflict Prevention, Response and Resolution (INFOCORE)
INFOCORE is an international collaborative research project funded under the 7th European Framework Program of the European Commission. It comprises leading experts from all social sciences dealing, and includes nine renowned research institutions from seven countries. Its main aim is to investigate the role(s) that media play in the emergence or prevention, the escalation or de-escalation, the management, resolution, and reconciliation of violent conflict. INFOCORE provides a systematically comparative assessment of various kinds of media, interacting with a wide range of relevant actors and producing diverse kinds of conflict coverage. It focuses on three main conflict regions – the Middle East, the West Balkans, and the African Great Lakes area. Its findings address both the socially interactive production process behind the creation of conflict coverage, and the dynamics of information and meaning disseminated via the media. INFOCORE focuses on the conditions that bring about different media roles in the cycle of conflict and peace building. It generates knowledge on the social processes underlying the production of conflict news, and the inherent dynamics of conflict news contents, in a systematically comparative fashion. Based on this perspective, the project identifies the conditions under which media play specific constructive or destructive roles in preventing, managing, and resolving violent conflict, and building sustainable peace. INFOCORE reconstructs the production process of conflict-related media contents, focusing on the interactions between professional journalists, political actors, experts/NGOs, and lay publics. It analyzes these actors’ different roles as sources or advocates, mediators, users and audiences in the production of professional news media, social media, and semi-public expert analysis. To assess the roles of media for shaping conflict perceptions and responses to ongoing conflicts, INFOCORE analyzes the dynamics of conflict news content over time. It identifies recurrent patterns of information diffusion and the polarization/consolidation of specific frames and determines the main contextual factors that influence the roles media play in conflict and peace building. Specifically, the project assesses the roles of individual agendas and resources, professional norms, media organizations and systems, political systems, and characteristics of the conflict situation. The INFOCORE project team has taken up its work on January 1, 2014. Its findings and selected data will be accessible to all public. During and beyond the project duration, we invite collaboration by interested researchers and practitioners.
Partners